Breeding Strategy of Local Muscovy to Support the Development of Meat Type Duck Industry

Triana Susanti

Abstract

Muscovy duck is one of the genetic resources of waterfowl that spreads almost all over Indonesia. Muscovy duck is classified as meat-producer waterfowl, because of its relatively large body weight and better meat quality compared to other waterfowl. Therefore, cross breeding between Muscovy and ducks were often conducted by farmers to produce offspring with large body weight in order to anticipate the higher demand for duck meat. If this crossing pattern has been widely adopted by breeders, it will require a larger number of Muscovy duck. Whereas, currently the population of Muscovy is relatively low and no breeding system exists both at the community farm level or industrial level. Therefore, a development program of local Muscovy duck, especially its breeding program needs to be done immediately. As an information material to facilitate the preparation of the program, this paper describes factors that affect the breeding program including production performance and reproduction, as well as the breeding strategy of Muscovy duck as candidates of male line to form special type of meat type ducks through 3 groups of livestock breeds in the shape of a conical triangle at the top. The top position was the pure stock (nucleus), the middle was the parent stock (multiplier) and the bottom was the commercial stock. The genetic quality of livestock flows from the top position to the bottom and  cannot  be the other way around, because the breeding system is closed in the pure stock (nucleus).

Keywords

Meat type duck; white muscovy; breeding strategy

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akinola LAF, Essien A. 2011. Relevance of rural poultry production in developing countries with special reference to Africa. World's Poultry Science Journal 67: 697-705.

Awad AL, Fahim HN, Beshara MM. 2016. Effect of Season And Dietary L-Carnitine Supplementation On Productive And Reproductive Performance Of Local Duck Breeds. Egypt. Poult. Sci. 36(I): 29-51.

Biswas S, Banerjee R, Bhattacharyya D, Patra G, Das AK, Das SK. 2019. Technological investigation into duck meat and its products - a potential alternative to chicken. World's Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 75, December 2019. Pp: 609-620.

Bunchasak C. 2019. Fundamentals of Duck Science. Asian Agribiz Conference. Duck Meat Quality Conference. Bangkok, Thailand. 12-13 November 2019.

Cheng YS, Rouvier R, Hu YH, Tai JJL, Tai C. Breeding and genetics of waterfowl. World's Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 59, December 2003. Pp: 509-519.

Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan. 2015. Statistik Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan. Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia.

Etuk IF, Ojewola GS, Akomas S, Etuk EB, Ogbuewu IP. 2011. Egg production potentials of Muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata) raised under three management systems in the humid tropics. Nigerian Journal of Animal Science 13: 70-75.

FAO. 2017. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. FAOSTAT Database on Agriculture. Rome, Italy: 2017.

Farghly MFA, Mahrose KM, Ullah Z, Rehman ZU, Ding C. 2017. Influence of swimming time in alleviating the deleterious effects of hot summer on growing Muscovy duck performance. 2017 Poultry Science 96:3912–3919.

Febrianto N, Hartono B, Yulinarsari AP. 2020. Supply Chain Management Information System of Duck Meat at Madura Island (Case Study at Sinjay Duck Restaurant). The 4th Animal Production International Seminar. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 478 (2020) 012087. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/478/1/012087.

Galal A, Ali WAH, Ahmed AMH, Ali KAA. 2011. Performance and carcass characteristics of Dumyati, Muscovy, Peking and Sudani duck breeds. Egyptian J. Anim. Prod. 48(2):191-202.

Gerzilov V, Kazachka D, Jeleva S, Petrov P, Sabev M, Nikolov I. 2011. Effect of cryoprotectants on the mobility and the morphological integrity of muscovy spermatozoa. Zesz. Nauk. UP Wroc, Biol. Hod. Zwierz. LXII, 580: 157–165.

Harun MAS, Veeneklaas RJ, Kampen MV, Mabasso M. 1998. Breeding Biology of Muscovy duck Cairina moschata in Natural Incubation: The Effect of Nesting Behavior on Hatchability. Poultry Science 77:1280–1286.

Huda N, Putra AA, Ahmad R. 2010. Potential Application of Duck Meat for Development of Processed Meat Products. Curr. Res. Poult. Sci. ISSN 2152-2111/DOI: 10.3923/crps.2010.

Ikani I. 2003. Duck production in Nigeria. Poultry Series No.7. National Agricultural Extension and Research Liaison Services, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria. Pp. 31.

Indarsih B, Ichsan M, Tamzil MH 2016: Pekin duck (Anas domesticus) farming in Mataram district of Lombok Indonesia: prospects and problems. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 28, Article #180. Retrieved November 13, 2020, from https://www.lrrd.org/lrrd28/10/inda28180.html.

Ismoyowati, Tugiyanti E, Mufti M, Purwantini D. 2017. Sexual dimorphism and identification of single nucleotide polymorphism of growth hormone gene in Muscovy duck. J. Indonesian Trop. Anim. Agric. 42(3):167-174. DOI: 10.14710/jitaa.

Laila D. Abd El-Samee, Hewida M.H. El-Allawy and Nagwa A. Maghraby. 2012. Comparative Study on Some Productive Traits of Muscovy and Sudani Ducks in Egypt. International Journal of Poultry Science. 11 (4): 264-268.

Lembong JE, Santa NM, Makalew A, Elly FH. 2015. Analisis break even point usaha ternak itik pedaging (Studi Kasus Pada Usaha Itik Milik Kelompok Masawang Di Desa Talikuran Kecamatan Remboken). Zootrek Journal 35(1):39- 45.

Mengesha M. 2012. Chicken production scenarios and the headway options for improvement in Ethiopia. World's Poultry Science Journal 68: 299-305.

Michalczuk M, Damaziak K, Pietrzak D, Marzec A, Chmiel M, Adamczak L, Florowski T. 2017. Influence of housing system on selected quality characteristics of duck meat. Chapter 2. Muscovy duck. (Ann. Warsaw Univ. of Life Sci. – SGGW, Anim. Sci. 56 (2): 277-285. DOI 10.22630/AAS.2017.56.2.29.

Matitaputty PR, Suryana. 2010. Karakteristik Daging Itik Dan Permasalahan Serta Upaya Pencegahan Off-Flavor Akibat Oksidasi Lipida. Wartazoa 20 (3) :130-138.

Mona E, Younis M. 2015. Influence of Dietary L-Carnitine on Productive Performance, Internal Organs and Carcass Characters of Two Duck Breeds Reared for Foie Gras Production. Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 2015, 44: 159-168. ISSN 1110-2047, www.alexjvs.com. DOI: 10.5455/ajvs.178704.

Muhlisin, Kim DS, Song YR, Kim HR, Kwon HJ, An BK, Kang CW, Kim HK, Lee SK. Comparison of Meat Characteristics between Korean Native Duck and Imported Commercial Duck Raised under Identical Rearing and Feeding Condition. Korean J. Food Sci. An. 33(1):89-95. DOI https://dx.do.org/10.5851/kosfa.2013.33.1.89.

Nickolova M. 2004. Effect of the sex ratio on the egg fertility of Muscovy duck (Cairina moshcata). Journal Central European Agriculture. 5(4):367-372.

Ogah DM, Musa IS. 2011. Evaluation of growth and egg production traits between first and second laying cycle in two ecotypes of muscovy duck. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference, KRMIVA, June 8- 10, 2011, Croatia.

Pervin W, Chowdhury SD, Hasnath MR, Khan MJ, Ali MA and Raha SK. 2013. Duck production strategy and profile of duck farmers in the coastal areas of Bangladesh. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 25, Article #129.Retrieved November 16, 2020, from https://www.lrrd.org/lrrd25/7/perv25129.htm.

Pingel H. 2011. Waterfowl production for food security. Lohmann Information. Waterfowl Production for Food Security. 46 (2):32-42.

Pingel H. 1999. Influence of breeding and management on the efficiency of duck production. Lohmann Information. No. 22:7-13.

Prasetyo LH. 2006. Strategi Dan Peluang Pengembangan Pembibitan Ternak Itik. WARTAZOA 16(3):109-115.

Prasetyo LH, Susanti T. 2007. Estimation of genetic parameters for body weight of Alabio and Mojosari ducks at starter period. JITV 12(3): 212-217.

Putra A, Rukmiasih, Afnan R. 2015. Persentase dan Kualitas Karkas Itik Cihateup-Alabio (CA) pada Umur Pemotongan yang Berbeda. Jurnal Ilmu Produksi dan Teknologi Hasil Peternakan 3(1): 27-32.

Purba M, Ketaren PP. 2012. Konsumsi dan konversipakan itik lokal jantan umur delapan minggu dengan penambahan santoquin dan vitamin E dalam pakan. JITV. 16:280-287.

Purba M, Prasetyo LH. 2014. Growth and carcass production responses of EPMp broiler ducks to various levels of crude fiber and protein in the diet. JITV19(3):220-230.DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.14334/jitv.v19i3.1085.

Selim SA, Gaafar KM, El-ballal SS. 2012. Influence of in-ovo administration with vitamin E and ascorbic acid on the performance of Muscovy ducks. Emir. J. Food Agric. 24 (3): 264-271.

Suparyanto A, Martojo H, Hardjosworo PS, Prasetyo LH. 2004. Kurva pertumbuhan morfologi itik betina hasil silang antara Pekin dengan Mojosari Putih. JITV 9(2): 87-97.

Suryana, Kurniawan H, Hadi SN. 2016. Kualitas Karkas Itik Pedaging dengan Pemberian Level Dosis Jamu Herbal Berbeda. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Inovasi Teknologi Pertanian. Banjarbaru.

Suryana. 2007. Prospek dan peluang pengembangan itik Alabio di Kalimantan Selatan. J. Litbang Pertanian 26(3): 109 – 114.

Susanti TS, Sopiyana S, Purba M, Prasetyo LH, Iskandar S, Raharjo YC. 2006. Koleksi dan Karakterisasi Biologis Itik dan Entog secara Ex-Situ di Balai Penelitian Ternak Ciawi Bogor. Laporan Hasil-hasil Penelitian Balitnak. Ciawi-Bogor.

Susanti T, Purba M, Prasetyo LH. The Potential of White Muscovy as Parent Stock for the Production of Broiler Ducks. Proceedings of International Seminar on Livestock Production and Veterinary Technology 2016. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.14334/Proc.Intsem.LPVT-2016-p.359-364.

Tamzil MH. 2008. Sumber Daya Genetik Entok (Cairina moschata): Profil dan Potensi Produksi sebagai Penghasil Daging. Wartazoa 28(3):129-138.

Yakubu A. 2013. Characterisation of the local Muscovy duck in Nigeria and its potential for egg and meat production. World's Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 69:931-938. doi:10.1017/S0043933913000937.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c)  2021 WARTAZOA. Indonesian Bulletin of Animal and Veterinary Sciences

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.