Multi-trait and multi-source selection indices for milk production and reproductive traits in a herd of Holstein cattle in Egypt

Eslam Faid-Allah


The main aim of this study was explore possibility to improve milk production and reproductive traits of Holstein cattle via selection index method which include general, reduced, sub and Multi-source of information indices (Own-Performance, Full-Sibs and Half-Sibs). Data was obtained from a commercial farm (Safi Masr for Developing the Animal Resources), located in the Nile Delta, Dakahlia, Egypt. Data included 4791 records of 1797 cows, 794 dams and 67 sires that represented the period from 2002 to 2012. Estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters for studied traits were computed and used to construct 18 selection indices to improve milk production and reproductive traits. Full index incorporating milk yield at 305d (305-dMY), lactation period (LP), days open (DO) and age at first calving (AFC) had the highest correlation with aggregate breeding value (Rih = 0.518; RE=100%). The correlation fell to 0.455 when 305-dMY was omitted from the index. The general index has the maximum expected genetic gain in 305-dMY (132.6 kg) per generation were accompanied by decrease of LP (-4.679 day), DO (-3.449 day) and AFC (-1.41 month) when all four traits were included in the index (I 1). The expected genetic gain for 305-dMY decreased to 26.84 kg/generation when 305-dMY was excluded in index 5 (I5). In addition, Using multi-source of information will enhance correlation with aggregate breeding value (Rih= 0.740; RE=142.91%) and raised the expected genetic gain per generation for 305-dMY (209 kg) and decreasing the expected genetic gain for LP (-6.37 day), DO (-4.244 day) and AFC (1.843 month) when all four traits were included in the index (I16). It could be suggested using the higher indexes of Rih (I1 (RE=100)) to improve milk production and reproductive traits in Holstein cattle under own-performance strategy and using (I16 (RE=142.91)) under multi-source strategy to get high accuracy and higher expected genetic changes per generation compare to general index.


Body Weight; Genetic Parameter; Selection Index; Holstein Cattle

Full Text:



Abdel-Gader AZ, Khair M, Ahmed A, Lutfi MA, Peters KJ. 2007. Milk yield and reproductive performance of Friesian cows under Sudan tropical conditions. Arch Tierz Dummerstorf. 50:155-164.

Abou-Bakr S, Alhammad HOA, Sadek RR, Nigm AA. 2006. Productive and reproductive characteristics of Holstein cows raised under intensive farming system in Egypt. Egypt J Anim Prod. 43:91-98.

Abou-Bakr S, El-Saied UM, Ibrahimm MAM. 2000. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for milk yield, days open and number of services per conception of Holstein cows of a commercial herd in Egypt. Egypt J Anim Prod. 37:9-17.

Ashmawy AA, Khalil MH. 1990. Single and multi-trait selection for lactation in Holstein-Friesian cows Egypt. J Anim Prod. 272:171-184.

Atil H. 2006. A comparison of different selection indices for genetic improvement for milk traits in Holstein Friesian cattle in turkey by using one standard deviation as a relative economic weight. Pak J Biological Sci. 9:285-288.

Atil H, Gevrekci Y. 2005. A comparison of different selection indices for genetic improvement of some dairy milk traits in Holstein Friesian cow in Turkey. J Appl Anim Res. 27:117-120.

Ayied AY, Jadoa AJ, Abdulrada AJ. 2011. Heritabilities and breeding values of production and reproduction traits of Holstein cattle in Iraq. J Basrah Res Sci. 37:66-70.

Banga CB. 2009. The Development of Breeding Objectives for Holstein and Jersey Cattle in South Africa. The Free State University, Faculty of Natural and Agriculture Science, Department of Animal Wildlife and Grassland Science. p. 29.

Boldman KG, Kriese LA, Van Vleck LD, Kachman SD. 1995. A manual for use of MTDFREML. A set of programs to obtain estimates of variances and covariances (DRAFT). Washington DC (USA): ARS, USDA.

Cardoso VL, Lima MLP, Nogueira JR, de Carneiro RLR, Sesana C, Oliveira EJ, El Faro L. 2014. Economic values for milk production and quality traits in south and southeast regions of Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia R Bras Zootec. 4312:636-642.

Cunningham E. 1969. Animal Breeding Theory. Landbrukshofhandelen, universities for Laget, Vollebek, Oslo.

Dadpasand M, Zamiri MJ, Atashi H. 2013. Genetic correlation of average somatic cell score at different stages of lactation with milk yield and composition in Holstein cows. Iranian J Vet Res. 14:190-196.

El-Arian MN, El-Awady HG, Khattab AS. 2003. Genetic analysis for some productive traits of Holstein Friesian cows in Egypt through MTDFREML program. Egypt J Anim Prod. 40:99-109.

El-Shalmani AF. 2011. Evaluation of production performance in relation to genetic structure of some economical traits in Friesian cows (Thesis). [Egypt]: Alexandria University.

Endris M, Tumwasorn S, Sopannarath P, Prasanpanich S. 2013. Genotype by region interaction on milk production traits of Holstein crossbred dairy cows in Thailand. Kasetsaart J Nat Sci. 47:228-237.

Faid-Allah E. 2015. Genetic and non-genetic analysis for milk productive and reproductive traits in Holstein cattle in Egypt. JITV. 20:10-17. DOI:

Faid-Allah E, Ghoneim E. 2012. Comparing different methods for estimating economic values in selection index for pre-weaning body weights of Friesian heifers in Egypt. Egyptian J Anim Prod. 49:73-80.

Ghiasi H, Nejati-Javaremi A, Pakdel A, Gonzalez-Recio O. 2013. Selection strategies for fertility traits of Holstein cows in Iran. Livest Sci. 152:11-15.

Ghiasi H, Pakdel A, Nejati-Javaremi A, Gonzalez-Recio O. 2015. Fertility subindex for improving fertility performance in Iranian Holstein cows. Trop Anim Health Prod. 47:67-71.

González-Recio O, Chang Y, Gianola D, Weigel K. 2006. Comparison of models using different censoring scenarios for days open in Spanish Holstein cows. J Anim Sci. 82, 233-239.

Hammoud MH. 2013. Genetic aspects of some first lactation traits of Holstein cows in Egypt. Alex J Agric Res. 58:295-300.

Kaygisiz A. 2013. Estimation of genetic parameters and breeding values for dairy cattle using test-day milk yield records. J Anim Plant Sci. 23:345-349.

Khattab AS, Sultan ZA. 1991. A comparison of different selection indices for genetic improvement of some dairy milk traits in Friesian cow in Egypt. J Anim Breed Genet. 108:349-354.

König, Swalve. 2009. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs. J Dairy Sci. 92:5292-5303.

Lakshmi BS, Gupta BR, Sudhakar K, Prakash MG, Sharma S. 2009. Genetic analysis of production performance of 642 Holstein Friesian×Sahiwal cows. Tamilnadu J Vet Anim Sci. 5:143-148.

Liljedahl L, Kolstad N, Sørensen P, Majala K. 1979. Scandinavian selection and crossbreeding experiment with laying hens.1- Back ground and general outline. Acta Agric Scandi. 29:273-286.

Matlab. 2002. The Language of technical computing. Release 13 by The MathWorks, Inc.

Meyer K. 1985. Genetic parameters for dairy production of Australian Black and White cows. Livest Prod Sci. 12:205-219.

Miglior F, Muir BL, Van Doormaal BJ. 2005. Selection indices in Holstein cattle of various countries. J Dairy Sci. 88:1255-1263.

Missanjo E, Imbayarwo-Chikosi V, Halimani T. 2013. A Proposed selection index for Jersey cattle in Zimbabwe. ISRN Vet Sci. 1-3.

Norman HD, Wright JR, Miller RH. 2010. Response to alternative genetic-economic indices for Holsteins across 2 generations. J Dairy Sci. 93:2695-2702.

Osman MM, El-Bayomi KM, Moawed SA. 2013a. Genetic and non-genetic factors affecting some productive and reproductive traits in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows raised in Egypt for the first two lactations. Suez Canal Vet Med J. XVIII:99-113.

Osman MM, El-Bayomi KM, Moawed SA. 2013b. Estimation of heritabilities, genetic correlations, phenotypic correlations and genetic trends for production and reproduction traits of Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle using sire model. Suez Canal Vet Med J. XVIII:115-128.

Salem MA, Esmoil HM, Sadek RR, Nigm AA. 2006. Phenotypic and genetic parameters of milk production and reproductive performance of Holstein cattle under the intensive production system in Egypt. Egypt J Anim Prod. 43:1-10.

Shalaby NA, El-Barbary ASA, Oudah EZM, Helmy M. 2012. Genetic parameters and breeding values of some productive and reproductive traits Friesian cattle in Egypt. Proceeding the 15th AAAP Animal Science. Congress 26-30, Thummassat Univ., Rangift, Thailand.

Suhail SM, Ahmed I, Hafez A, Ahmed S, Jan D, Khan S, Rahman A. 2010. Genetic study of some reproductive traits of Jersey cattle under subtropical conditions. J Agric. 26:87-91.

Tekerli M, Kocak S. 2009. Relationships between production and fertility traits in first lactation and lifetime performances of Holstein cows under subtrobical condition. Arch Tier. 52:364-370.

Usman T, Guo G, Suhail SM, Ahmed S, Qiaoxiang L, Qureshi MS, Wang Y. 2012. Performance traits study of Holstein Friesian cattle under subtropical conditions. J Anim Plant Sci. 22:92-95.

Wagenaar D, Arendonk J, Van Kramer M. 1995. Selection Index Program (SIP), User manual. Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agriculture, Universitas Netherlands.

Wahinya PK, Okeno TO, Kosgey IS, Kahi AK. 2015. Economic and biological values for pasture-based dairy cattle production systems and their application in genetic improvement in the tropics. J Anim Prod Adv. 5:664-675

Van der Werf J, Goddard M. 2003. Models and methods for genetic analysis. Armidale animal breeding, Summer course, New England University.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.