Application of Reproduction Biotechnology and Molecular Genetic to Improve Productivity of Local Pigs

Bayu Dewantoro Putro Soewandi

Abstract

Low productivity in local pigs is due to the absence of breeding plan with mating arrangements. The main productivity variables used in breeding are litter size (number of piglets), weaning litter, number of teats, sow productivity index, growth rate, slaughter weight, and carcass quality. Selection to produce a new breed in breeding scheme should be conducted within five generations requiring large numbers of livestock, length period, and costly. Biotechnology reproduction and genetic molecular can be used to increase the value of the variables, to shorten interval generation, and cost efficient. This paper provides information on the use of reproduction biotechnology and molecular genetic from various sources and utilization of both technologies to increase local pig productivity. Reproductive biotechnology is useful in mating arrangement and molecular genetic using marker assisted selection (MAS) is able to determine superior pig since early age.

Keywords

Local pig; reproduction biotechnology; molecular genetic; productivities

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arganosa VG, Gatmaitan OM, Villeta MO, Hubilla PRL. 1991. The performance of purebred and crossbred sows. AJAS. 4:143-150.

Aritonang D, Silalahi M, Manurung T. 1995. Penampilan produksi beberapa galur babi lokal di Indonesia. Dalam: Sutama IK, Haryanto B, Sinurat AP, Chaniago TD, Zainuddin D, penyunting. Pengolahan dan Komunikasi Hasil Penelitian. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains dan Teknologi Peternakan. Bogor, 25-26 Januari 1995. Bogor (Indonesia): Puslitbangnak. hlm. 63-68.

Chvojková Z, Hraška Š. 2008. Changes in reproductive traits of large white pigs after estrogen receptor gene-based selection in Slovakia: Preliminary results. Asian-Australasian J Anim Sci. 21:320-324.

Ciobanu DC, Day AE, Nagy A, Wales R, Rothschild MF, Plastow GS. 2001. Genetic variation in two conserved local Romanian pig breeds using type 1 DNA markers. Genet Sel Evol. 33:417-32.

Fujii J, Orsu K, Zorzato F, de Leon S, Khanna VK, Weiler JE, O’Brien PJ, Maclennan DH. 1991. Identification of a mutation in porcine ryanodine receptor associated with malignant hyperthermia. Science 253:448-451.

Gea M. 2009. Penampilan ternak babi lokal periode grower dengan penambahan biotetes SOZOFM-4 dalam ransum. Bogor (Indonesia): Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Gonzalez-Pena D, Knox RV, Rodriguez-Zas SL. 2016. Contribution of semen trait selection, artificial insemination technique, and semen dose to the profitability of pig production systems: A simulation study. Theriogenology. 85:335-344.

Gunawan A, Kaewmala K, Uddin MJ, Cinar MU, Tesfaye D, Phatsara C, Tholen E, Looft C, Schellander K. 2011. Association study and expression analysis of porcine ESR1 as a candidate gene for boar fertility and sperm quality. Anim Reprod Sci. 128:11-21.

Gunawan M, Kaiin EM, Said S. 2015. Aplikasi inseminasi buatan dengan sperma sexing dalam meningkatkan produktivitas sapi di peternakan rakyat. Dalam: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biodiversitas Indonesia. Biodiversitas 1:93-96.

Kaewmala K, Uddin MJ, Cinar MU, Große-Brinkhaus C, Jonas E, Tesfaye D, Phatsara C, Tholen E, Looft C, Schellander K. 2011. Association study and expression analysis of CD9 as candidate gene for boar sperm quality and fertility traits. Anim Reprod Sci. 125:170-179.

Kamiński S, Ruść A, Wojtasik K. 2002. Simultaneous identification of ryanodine receptor 1 (RYR1) and estrogen receptor (ESR) genotypes with the multiplex PCR-RFLP method in Polish Large White and Polish Landrace pigs. J Appl Genet. 43:331-335.

Knox RV. 2016. Artificial insemination in pigs today. Theriogenology. 85:83-93.

Kumchoo T, Mekchay S. 2015. Association of non-synonymous SNPs of OPN gene with litter size traits in pigs. Arch Anim Breed. 58:317-323.

Lubis, Adriana M. 2000. Pemberdayaan bioteknologi reproduksi untuk peningkatan mutu genetik ternak. Wartazoa. 10:1-6.

Lukac D, Vidovic V, Krnjaic J, Strbac L, Visnjic V, Stupar M. 2012. The Effect of crossing between Landrace and Yorkshire in relation to maternal heterosis. Krmiva Zagreb. 54:41-46.

Manurung DP. 2014. Performans reproduksi pada induk babi di PT Mahakata Farm Sukses Kabupaten Karo Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Bogor (Indonesia): Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Martinez EA, Caamaño JN, Gil MA, Rieke A, McCauley TC, Cantley TC, Vazquez JM, Roca J, Vazquez JL, Didion BA, et al. 2004. Successful nonsurgical deep uterine embryo transfer in pigs. Theriogenology. 61:137-146.

Mikami H, Fredeen HT, Sather AP. 1977. Mass selection in a pig population. 2. The effect of inbreeding within the selcted populations. Can J Anim Sci. 57:627-634.

Montolalu FM. 2017. Penggunaan PMSG dan hCG induk sebelum pengawinan untuk menghasilkan anak babi yang lebih sehat dan unggul. Bogor (Indonesia): Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Neal SM, Johnson RK, Kittok RJ. 1989. Index selection for components of litter size in swine: Response to five generations of selection. J Anim Sci. 67:1933-1945.

Noor RR. 2008. Genetika ternak. Jakarta (Indonesia): Penebar Swadaya.

Okere C, Nelson L. 2002. Novel reproductive techniques in swine production - A review. Asian-Australasian J Anim Sci. 15:445-452.

Omelka R, Martiniaková M, Peškovičové D, Bauerová M. 2008. Associations between Alu I polymorphism in the prolactin receptor gene and reproductive traits of Slovak large white, white meaty and landrace pigs. Asian-Australasian J Anim Sci. 21:484-488.

Panggabean R, Arifiantini I, Nalley WM, Achmadi B. 2014. Hubungan antara ukura testis dengan volume semen dan konsentrasi spermatozoa pada babi. Dalam: Prosiding Seminar dan Lokakarya Nasional Ternak Babi. Denpasar (Indonesia): Universitas Udayana. hlm. 76-85.

Rempel LA, Nonneman DJ, Wise TH, Erkens T, Peelman LJ, Rohrer GA. 2010. Association analyses of candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms on reproductive traits in swine. J Anim Sci. 88:1-15.

Rothschild MF. 2000. Advances in pig molecular genetics, gene mapping and genomics. ITEA. 96A:349-361.

Rothschild MF, Ruvinsky A, Larson G, Gongora J, Cucchi T, Dobney K, Andersson L, Plastow G, Nicholas FW, Moran C, et al. 2011. The genetics of the pig. 2nd ed. Rothschild MF, Ruvinsky A, editors. London (UK): CAB International.

Rybalko P, Semenov VV, Tret’yakova OL, Kononova LV, Pluzhnikov OV. 2011. Breeding indices when evaluating the genotype of pigs. Russ Agric Sci. 37:76-78.

Samorè AB, Fontanesi L. 2016. Genomic selection in pigs: State of the art and perspectives. Ital J Anim Sci. 15:211-232.

Schmidt M, Kragh PM, Li J, Du Y, Lin L, Liu Y, Bøgh IB, Winther KD, Vajta G, Callesen H. 2010. Pregnancies and piglets from large white sow recipients after two transfer methods of cloned and transgenic embryos of different pig breeds. Theriogenology. 74:1233-1240.

Sipahelut GM. 2001. Keterkaitan antara mutasi gen RYR-1 dengan kualitas daging pada babi. Bogor (Indonesia): Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Soewandi BDP, Sumadi, Hartatik T. 2013. Estimasi output babi di Kabupaten Tabanan Provinsi Bali. Buletin Peternakan. 37:165-172.

Soewandi BDP, Talib C. 2015. Pengembangan ternak babi lokal di Indonesia. Wartazoa. 25:39-46.

Spötter A, Distl O. 2006. Genetic approaches to the improvement of fertility traits in the pig. Vet J. 172:234-247.

Talib C. 2017. Komunikasi pribadi. (unpublished)

Talib C, Anang A, Indrijani H. 2009. Evaluasi genetik pada sapi perah. Dalam: Santosa KA, Diwyanto K, Toharmat T, penyunting. Profile usaha peternakan sapi perah di Indonesia. Bogor (Indonesia): LIPI Press. hlm. 71-116.

Tang Z, Liang R, Zhao S, Wang R, Huang R, Li K. 2014. CNN3 is regulated by microrna-1 during muscle development in pigs. Int J Biol Sci. 10:377-385.

Van VTK, Duc NV. 1999. Heritabilities, generic and phenotypic correlations between reproductive performnace on Mong Cai and Large White Breeds. Proc Assoc Advmt/Anim Breed Genet. 13:153-156.

Verardo LL, Silva FF, Lopes MS, Madsen O, Bastiaansen JWM, Knol EF, Kelly M, Varona L, Lopes PS, Guimarães SEF. 2016. Revealing new candidate genes for reproductive traits in pigs: Combining Bayesian GWAS and functional pathways. Genet Sel Evol. 48:1-13.

Verardo LL, Silva FF, Varona L, Resende MDV, Bastiaansen JWM, Lopes PS, Guimarães SEF. 2014. Bayesian GWAS and network analysis revealed new candidate genes for number of teats in pigs. J Appl Genet. 56:123-132.

Vidovic V, Lukac D, Stupar M, Visnjic V, Krnjaic J. 2012. Heritability and repeatability estimates of reproduction traits in purebred pigs. Biotechnol Anim Husb. 28:455–462.

Visscher P, Pong-Wong R, Whittemore C, Haley C. 2000. Impact of biotechnology on (cross) breeding programmes in pigs. Livest Prod Sci. 65:57-70.

Yoshioka K, Noguchi M, Suzuki C. 2012. Production of piglets from in vitro-produced embryos following non-surgical transfer. Anim Reprod Sci. 131:23-29.

Zebua CKN. 2017. Perbandingan produktivitas tiga bangsa babi eksotik di BPTU-HPT Siborong-borong, Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Bogor (Indonesia): Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c)  2017 WARTAZOA. Indonesian Bulletin of Animal and Veterinary Sciences

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.